If, "as per" a fraudulently-obtained restraining or protective order, one is "protected" from another, and the protected party wants to nullify her/his own order of protection (which was granted based on perjury)... and have their own personal adversarial protective order to worry about...just send an e-mail like this one to your "alleged" "stalker":
Delivered-To: stu.911@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.11.1 with SMTP id r1cs159868qcr;
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.231.172.205])
by 10.231.172.205 with SMTP id m13mr12643298ibz.35.1282098912337
(num_hops = 1);
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.172.205 with SMTP id m13mr8604470ibz.35.1282098911814;
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-To: stu.911@gmail.com
X-Forwarded-For: jeffrey.delarosa@gmail.com stu.911@gmail.com
Delivered-To: jeffrey.delarosa@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.208.71 with SMTP id gb7cs20108ibb;
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path:
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ashleygreenspan0101@gmail.com
designates 10.220.93.17 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.220.93.17;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (
google.com: domain of ashleygreenspan0101@gmail.com designates 10.220.93.17
as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ashleygreenspan0101@gmail.com;
dkim=pass header.i=ashleygreenspan0101@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.220.93.17])
by 10.220.93.17 with SMTP id t17mr6261126vcm.266.1282098907424
(num_hops = 1);
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:reply-to:received
:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=2mCNwLedMOkAl0Zt6pCK4TRfK2hzoWPlfW9A9lfHQjU=;
b=IEQjh0tanIJ3wJTosBGrWR3xJouvN/PBCvb66yHLCOu96MCcjZKmFFXexDN+Efwqxx
CarslDhXwFGqElszhvl0Ysqw4UY6EBqHV0iIb1Y6sPSVNaYsyfaSSbV1stAiFxOIuks1
JKs5ibUT8m9EQIm1WFviJVfgLBzvfpJ5qhwOA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=Q+2v4/E+XlzbpVnjUxD7Mt2QRxN2Sxmn/sHEPuy/VHQQs10klprbPjrnkpLR0edVPZ
cfwF0C0Mv/JX/KiuaKXzeU0GJXHhHg/EjR2IHZSm4PtX6kf/XdUkAgZ44GhWm79cIieF
4v3lQn/N/PxPEzFCaaOMObQA5QS8TM0gi9T40=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.93.17 with SMTP id t17mr4509868vcm.266.1282098906458; Tue,
17 Aug 2010 19:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: ashleygreenspan0101@gmail.com
Reply-To: rescue@barksoflove.org
Received: by 10.220.181.204 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:05 -0700 (PDT)Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:35:05 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GcXitOgz85tobzh25QP5hwgBbG8
Message-ID:
Subject: Did you enjoy your day in court? :)
From: Barks of Love Rescue
To: jeffrey.delarosa@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001636284f88e30e0c048e0fe94a
--001636284f88e30e0c048e0fe94a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
By the way, on behalf of Barks of Love, here is a picture of Brody -
being a lap dog :)
As per your boardwatch post, you claim that this "lap dog" mauled your
dog Maeve and that Barks of Love must be inappropriately representing
him, as well as your claim that Barks of Love holds pit bulls for
years! We rescued Brody just about a year ago and so he is now the
longest dog Barks of Love has had. We do have a lot of potential
adopters!
You like to claim that you don't engage in defamation...ha! Don't
defame a dog!!! Posting false information about a dog is actionable
by law! You must know that mr lawyer!
We also have many videos of him playing with other dogs. In fact, he
currently lives with 2 yorkies, a poodle and a pitbull puppy!
Thanks,
Barks of Love
--001636284f88e30e0c048e0fe94a
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="P1010160.JPG"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="P1010160.JPG"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Attachment-Id: f_gczkg02o0
Dear readers,
I suppose that "defaming a dog" might be actionable (you can sue anyone for anything...can you win? Can you afford to find out if you can win?) if one gets a very tolerant and not-too-busy-judge who will let one waste his/her time on revenge claims....and, if one can prove damages. It's a little different in Los Angeles Superior Court case no. BC44xxxx or no. 10M04196--status: DEFAULT JUDGEMENT VACATED- NEW TRIAL ORDERED. DEFENDANT ADDED...That's what happens when one doesn't show up and thinks that one has "won", and is so brash as to require a little poke fest on your Plaintiff (that's the one who sues...unlike some $100K educated legal professionals/ Defendants sometimes designate themselves as "Plaintiff" on their change of address forms Hmmm...October is just around the bend.
By the way, readers, this (hi-res pictures uploading...)
is what the "lap dog" is capable of, so when adopting a dog from your local rescue, be sure to check out the local court records for those working at the rescue before you bring home "Tux"/"Brody," 70 lbs. of flesh tearing, surgery causing, unrelenting, dog-aggressive, male pit bull "lap dog..." which just might kill something you love---or, maybe the "rescuers" just might steal something you love. That's how they roll.
This dog, Tux , alias, "Brody" is a great dog...for someone who has no other animals and who has extensive near-professional experience with highly aggressive, predatory and territorial dogs. What kind of dog needs 10 months of professional full-time training? Oh...nice prong collar. Lap dogs need with 10 months of intensive training seem to need leashes while being photographed in the laps of naive and brainwashed volunteers?
